I think this is hilarious.

474 Replies

So I went to this website and took this silly test and got this answer and followed it elsewhere and I think the result is funny. So I'm posting it here. BECAUSE WHAT ELSE IS LJ GOOD FOR?!

Portrait of an INFJ – Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging
(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling)

The Protector

As an INFJ, your primary mode of living is focused internally, where you take things in primarily via intuition. Your secondary mode is external, where you deal with things according to how you feel about them, or how they fit with your personal value system.

INFJs are gentle, caring, complex and highly intuitive individuals. Artistic and creative, they live in a world of hidden meanings and possibilities. Only one percent of the population has an INFJ Personality Type, making it the most rare of all the types.

INFJs place great importance on havings things orderly and systematic in their outer world. They put a lot of energy into identifying the best system for getting things done, and constantly define and re-define the priorities in their lives. On the other hand, INFJs operate within themselves on an intuitive basis which is entirely spontaneous. They know things intuitively, without being able to pinpoint why, and without detailed knowledge of the subject at hand. They are usually right, and they usually know it. Consequently, INFJs put a tremendous amount of faith into their instincts and intuitions. This is something of a conflict between the inner and outer worlds, and may result in the INFJ not being as organized as other Judging types tend to be. Or we may see some signs of disarray in an otherwise orderly tendency, such as a consistently messy desk.

INFJs have uncanny insight into people and situations. They get "feelings" about things and intuitively understand them. As an extreme example, some INFJs report experiences of a psychic nature, such as getting strong feelings about there being a problem with a loved one, and discovering later that they were in a car accident. This is the sort of thing that other types may scorn and scoff at, and the INFJ themself does not really understand their intuition at a level which can be verbalized. Consequently, most INFJs are protective of their inner selves, sharing only what they choose to share when they choose to share it. They are deep, complex individuals, who are quite private and typically difficult to understand. INFJs hold back part of themselves, and can be secretive.

But the INFJ is as genuinely warm as they are complex. INFJs hold a special place in the heart of people who they are close to, who are able to see their special gifts and depth of caring. INFJs are concerned for people's feelings, and try to be gentle to avoid hurting anyone. They are very sensitive to conflict, and cannot tolerate it very well. Situations which are charged with conflict may drive the normally peaceful INFJ into a state of agitation or charged anger. They may tend to internalize conflict into their bodies, and experience health problems when under a lot of stress.

Because the INFJ has such strong intuitive capabilities, they trust their own instincts above all else. This may result in an INFJ stubborness and tendency to ignore other people's opinions. They believe that they're right. On the other hand, INFJ is a perfectionist who doubts that they are living up to their full potential. INFJs are rarely at complete peace with themselves – there's always something else they should be doing to improve themselves and the world around them. They believe in constant growth, and don't often take time to revel in their accomplishments. They have strong value systems, and need to live their lives in accordance with what they feel is right. In deference to the Feeling aspect of their personalities, INFJs are in some ways gentle and easy going. Conversely, they have very high expectations of themselves, and frequently of their families. They don't believe in compromising their ideals.

INFJ is a natural nurturer; patient, devoted and protective. They make loving parents and usually have strong bonds with their offspring. They have high expectations of their children, and push them to be the best that they can be. This can sometimes manifest itself in the INFJ being hard-nosed and stubborn. But generally, children of an INFJ get devoted and sincere parental guidance, combined with deep caring.

In the workplace, the INFJ usually shows up in areas where they can be creative and somewhat independent. They have a natural affinity for art, and many excel in the sciences, where they make use of their intuition. INFJs can also be found in service-oriented professions. They are not good at dealing with minutia or very detailed tasks. The INFJ will either avoid such things, or else go to the other extreme and become enveloped in the details to the extent that they can no longer see the big picture. An INFJ who has gone the route of becoming meticulous about details may be highly critical of other individuals who are not.

The INFJ individual is gifted in ways that other types are not. Life is not necessarily easy for the INFJ, but they are capable of great depth of feeling and personal achievement.

474 thoughts on “I think this is hilarious.”

voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
1. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
  1. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  2. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  3. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  4. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  5. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  6. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  7. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  8. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  9. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  10. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  11. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  12. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  13. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  14. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  15. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  16. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  17. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  18. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  19. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  20. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  21. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  22. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  23. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  24. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  25. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  26. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  27. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  28. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  29. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  30. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  31. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  32. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  33. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  34. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  35. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  36. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  37. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  38. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  39. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
  40. voyeurprincess 06/08/2012 at 20:15
    
    Re: per usual
    
    I’m rather surprised my J isn’t higher, actually. I am always INTJ. 🙂
    
    Reply ↓
2. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
3. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
4. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
5. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
6. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
7. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
8. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
9. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
10. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
11. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
12. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
13. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
14. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
15. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
16. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
17. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
18. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
19. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
20. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
21. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
22. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
23. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
24. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
25. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
26. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
27. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
28. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
29. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
30. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
31. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
32. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
33. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
34. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
35. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
36. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
37. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
38. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:01
  
  Re: per usual
  
  hey, that’s my type… except my J % is very high.
  
  Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
voyeurprincess 04/08/2012 at 00:19

per usual

Your Type
INTJ
Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
anima_fauxsis 05/08/2012 at 18:51

Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
1. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
2. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
3. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
4. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
5. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
6. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
7. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
8. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
9. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
10. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
11. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
12. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
13. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
14. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
15. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
16. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
17. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
18. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
19. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
20. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
21. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
22. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
23. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
24. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
25. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
26. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
27. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
28. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
29. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
30. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
31. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
32. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
33. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
34. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
35. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
36. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
37. rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:20
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  It gets better!
  
  People my type:
  Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
  Andrew Grove – computer geek
  Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
  Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
  Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
  Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!
  
  Reply ↓
38. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
  1. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  2. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  3. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  4. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  5. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  6. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  7. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  8. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  9. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  10. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  11. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  12. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  13. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  14. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  15. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  16. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  17. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  18. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  19. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  20. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  21. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  22. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  23. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  24. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  25. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  26. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  27. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  28. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  29. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  30. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  31. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  32. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  33. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  34. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  35. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  36. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  37. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  38. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  39. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  40. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  41. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  42. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  43. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
  44. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:24
    
    Re: what the fuck?
    
    a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
    i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.
    
    Reply ↓
39. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
40. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
41. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
42. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
43. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
44. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
45. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
46. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
47. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
48. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
49. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
50. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
51. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
52. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
53. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
54. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
55. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
56. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
57. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
58. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
59. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
60. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
61. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
62. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
63. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
64. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
65. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
66. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
67. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
68. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
69. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
70. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
71. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
72. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
73. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
74. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
75. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
76. i_am_dsh 06/08/2012 at 20:02
  
  Re: what the fuck?
  
  that’s my type, with the high J %
  
  Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rbus 05/08/2012 at 23:15

what the fuck?

INTJ
Introvert(56%)
iNtuitive(50%)
Thinking(1%)
Judging(78%)

You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
(56%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
(50%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
(1%)
You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
(78%)

I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
1. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
  1. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
    1. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    2. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    3. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    4. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    5. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    6. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    7. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    8. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    9. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    10. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    11. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    12. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    13. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    14. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    15. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    16. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    17. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    18. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    19. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    20. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    21. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    22. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    23. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    24. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    25. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    26. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    27. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    28. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    29. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    30. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    31. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    32. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    33. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    34. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    35. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    36. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    37. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    38. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    39. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    40. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    41. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    42. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    43. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    44. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
    45. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:31
      
      hey!!!
      
      i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:
      
      “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”
      
      The Answer:
      “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”
      
      I Am Enlightened!
      
      Reply ↓
  2. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  3. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  4. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  5. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  6. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  7. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  8. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  9. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  10. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  11. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  12. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  13. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  14. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  15. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  16. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  17. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  18. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  19. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  20. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  21. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  22. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  23. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  24. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  25. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  26. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  27. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  28. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  29. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  30. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  31. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  32. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  33. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  34. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  35. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  36. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  37. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  38. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  39. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  40. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  41. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  42. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
  43. rbus 08/08/2012 at 23:20
    
    might as well do the I Ching thing…
    
    whenever i take those tests:
    
    i answer like they want me to.
    or
    i answer the opposite of the way i really would
    or
    i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.
    
    i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
    i’ve been paying for it ever since.
    
    buncha bullshit, anyway…
    
    Reply ↓
2. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
3. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
4. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
5. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
6. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
7. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
8. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
9. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
10. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
11. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
12. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
13. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
14. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
15. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
16. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
17. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
18. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
19. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
20. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
21. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
22. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
23. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
24. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
25. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
26. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
27. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
28. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
29. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
30. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
31. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
32. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
33. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
34. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
35. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
36. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
37. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
38. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
39. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
40. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
41. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
42. anima_fauxsis 08/08/2012 at 05:14
  
  Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.
  
  Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.
  
  Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓
rosehelene 08/08/2012 at 00:25

Very silly. The Myers-Briggs system has very little to no scientific legitimacy.

Reply ↓

You just keep going

Do the best you can

I think this is hilarious.

Portrait of an INFJ – Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging
(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling)

The Protector

474 thoughts on “I think this is hilarious.”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Portrait of an INFJ – Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling)

The Protector

474 thoughts on “I think this is hilarious.”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Portrait of an INFJ – Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging
(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling)