Saturday I did Christmas shopping in the morning while Noah gamed then we had a chore filled afternoon and a mellow evening. It was really nice. Sunday I had a great morning with farmer’s market and dim sum. Then I went up to the city by myself. This was our first lengthy mommy-time-off. It worked out fantastically well in my opinion. 🙂 I got to go to the graduation of a wonderful friend from a program that has been very important to her. I was happy and proud to be a witness to her recognition. Yay!
This was from a leather organization and there were several speakers. Five total. The first was a guy I have known for a few years and it was about what I would expect. He’s a really cool guy and I know how important this program is for him. I’m really happy he is so successful. The second was a guy I have seen at cons variously. I wanna talk about him a little.
He (I’m preserving anonymity consciously) is one of the best speakers I have seen in or out of the leather community. Let me tell you–he can sell me any kool-aid he wants. I was ready to line up at the pitcher when he was done talking. He has a beautiful voice and a compelling personality. I believe that the reason he is so compelling for me (and maybe for other people too, it’s hard to judge this sort of thing) is that he is completely at peace with himself and the world. He is a Leather Man. It has helped him feel his place in the universe. He doesn’t judge anyone else for what they do or don’t do. He doesn’t seem to feel superior because he is a Leather Man, he just feels that he is being as true to himself as possible by walking that path. I admire the degree to which he is self-actualized. I admire him the way I admire many people of faith.
Two of the other speakers were exactly what I would expect from this sort of ceremony–friendly and loving towards the people they know but not otherwise extraordinary. Good, solid people with friendly advice. They made me smile. Then we got to the last speaker. He very much meant well and the affection towards him in the room was palpable. Unfortunately, he had exactly the sort of tone that bothers me. Whereas the other major speaker had specifically said that we (I surmised the leather community) shouldn’t have enemies, this person encouraged us/them thinking. He talked about how the graduates are joining the ranks of those who “get” leather. I believe that I understand what he was trying to do and if I were part of that group I would probably smile and nod. But I’m not. And I felt alienated. And when I feel that way about a group I no longer have any interest in joining. I don’t want to do the us/them thing.
I think that this sort of us/them thing exists to fill the same hole churches used to fill. People want a sense of identity with a group and that used to be religion. Honestly, I feel that these sorts of groups are religious in nature whether they mention God or not. There are many groups out there that fall into this category in my mind: Journeyman, AA, Landmark, HAI, Masons, Burning Man, hell even Weight Watchers.
You know what? I don’t want to belong. I don’t want to be a joiner. I don’t want to need a community to set my sense of self. I’m thrilled for my friends who are happier in these communities, but I don’t want to be one of them. It’s an interesting thing to think about.
I think you’d be hard pressed to find any group of people that don’t do that from time to time. Probably if your freak breeders group takes off, you’ll notice that kind of conversation there too. The people I spend the most time with are scientists… evolution vs intelligent design, anyone? Scientists treat that like it’s “those who use their brain (us) vs those who don’t (them)”, both in the evolution argument and elsewhere. But just because people do that doesn’t make everyone in the community “joiners”, or people who “need a community to set [their] sense of self.” I think it’s just something you find in any community of people. Perhaps unsophisticated, perhaps a function of insecurity, but (in my mind) hardly a big enough cost to offset the payoffs of participating in and belonging to different communities.
The real question is, do communities actually have something to say about who you are — maybe not who you are for yourself, but how you get to express yourself to the world? I’d argue that they do, even as strongly as to say that how we get to express ourselves is entirely contingent on the people around us. Just try expressing yourself as a kinkster in a group of business people. Or as a scientist in a group of aryurvedic healers. Or a gay man in a group of Mormons. Or even a freak mom in a group of yuppie moms. Mostly we surround ourselves by people who are “like us” so we can be expressed in the way we want. Our communities actually have a lot to say about who we are, who we get to be in the world, beyond who we are just for ourselves. That’s the good news or the bad news, depending. 🙂
Hey, aren’t you supposed to be off lj during the week. 😛
edit: ok, you probably aren’t at work yet. 🙂
Hey, aren’t you supposed to be off lj during the week. 😛
edit: ok, you probably aren’t at work yet. 🙂
I think you’d be hard pressed to find any group of people that don’t do that from time to time. Probably if your freak breeders group takes off, you’ll notice that kind of conversation there too. The people I spend the most time with are scientists… evolution vs intelligent design, anyone? Scientists treat that like it’s “those who use their brain (us) vs those who don’t (them)”, both in the evolution argument and elsewhere. But just because people do that doesn’t make everyone in the community “joiners”, or people who “need a community to set [their] sense of self.” I think it’s just something you find in any community of people. Perhaps unsophisticated, perhaps a function of insecurity, but (in my mind) hardly a big enough cost to offset the payoffs of participating in and belonging to different communities.
The real question is, do communities actually have something to say about who you are — maybe not who you are for yourself, but how you get to express yourself to the world? I’d argue that they do, even as strongly as to say that how we get to express ourselves is entirely contingent on the people around us. Just try expressing yourself as a kinkster in a group of business people. Or as a scientist in a group of aryurvedic healers. Or a gay man in a group of Mormons. Or even a freak mom in a group of yuppie moms. Mostly we surround ourselves by people who are “like us” so we can be expressed in the way we want. Our communities actually have a lot to say about who we are, who we get to be in the world, beyond who we are just for ourselves. That’s the good news or the bad news, depending. 🙂
agreed
agreed