I think this is hilarious.

So I went to this website and took this silly test and got this answer and followed it elsewhere and I think the result is funny. So I'm posting it here. BECAUSE WHAT ELSE IS LJ GOOD FOR?!

Portrait of an INFJ – Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging
(Introverted Intuition with Extraverted Feeling)


The Protector

As an INFJ, your primary mode of living is focused internally, where you take things in primarily via intuition. Your secondary mode is external, where you deal with things according to how you feel about them, or how they fit with your personal value system.

INFJs are gentle, caring, complex and highly intuitive individuals. Artistic and creative, they live in a world of hidden meanings and possibilities. Only one percent of the population has an INFJ Personality Type, making it the most rare of all the types.

INFJs place great importance on havings things orderly and systematic in their outer world. They put a lot of energy into identifying the best system for getting things done, and constantly define and re-define the priorities in their lives. On the other hand, INFJs operate within themselves on an intuitive basis which is entirely spontaneous. They know things intuitively, without being able to pinpoint why, and without detailed knowledge of the subject at hand. They are usually right, and they usually know it. Consequently, INFJs put a tremendous amount of faith into their instincts and intuitions. This is something of a conflict between the inner and outer worlds, and may result in the INFJ not being as organized as other Judging types tend to be. Or we may see some signs of disarray in an otherwise orderly tendency, such as a consistently messy desk.

INFJs have uncanny insight into people and situations. They get "feelings" about things and intuitively understand them. As an extreme example, some INFJs report experiences of a psychic nature, such as getting strong feelings about there being a problem with a loved one, and discovering later that they were in a car accident. This is the sort of thing that other types may scorn and scoff at, and the INFJ themself does not really understand their intuition at a level which can be verbalized. Consequently, most INFJs are protective of their inner selves, sharing only what they choose to share when they choose to share it. They are deep, complex individuals, who are quite private and typically difficult to understand. INFJs hold back part of themselves, and can be secretive.

But the INFJ is as genuinely warm as they are complex. INFJs hold a special place in the heart of people who they are close to, who are able to see their special gifts and depth of caring. INFJs are concerned for people's feelings, and try to be gentle to avoid hurting anyone. They are very sensitive to conflict, and cannot tolerate it very well. Situations which are charged with conflict may drive the normally peaceful INFJ into a state of agitation or charged anger. They may tend to internalize conflict into their bodies, and experience health problems when under a lot of stress.

Because the INFJ has such strong intuitive capabilities, they trust their own instincts above all else. This may result in an INFJ stubborness and tendency to ignore other people's opinions. They believe that they're right. On the other hand, INFJ is a perfectionist who doubts that they are living up to their full potential. INFJs are rarely at complete peace with themselves – there's always something else they should be doing to improve themselves and the world around them. They believe in constant growth, and don't often take time to revel in their accomplishments. They have strong value systems, and need to live their lives in accordance with what they feel is right. In deference to the Feeling aspect of their personalities, INFJs are in some ways gentle and easy going. Conversely, they have very high expectations of themselves, and frequently of their families. They don't believe in compromising their ideals.

INFJ is a natural nurturer; patient, devoted and protective. They make loving parents and usually have strong bonds with their offspring. They have high expectations of their children, and push them to be the best that they can be. This can sometimes manifest itself in the INFJ being hard-nosed and stubborn. But generally, children of an INFJ get devoted and sincere parental guidance, combined with deep caring.

In the workplace, the INFJ usually shows up in areas where they can be creative and somewhat independent. They have a natural affinity for art, and many excel in the sciences, where they make use of their intuition. INFJs can also be found in service-oriented professions. They are not good at dealing with minutia or very detailed tasks. The INFJ will either avoid such things, or else go to the other extreme and become enveloped in the details to the extent that they can no longer see the big picture. An INFJ who has gone the route of becoming meticulous about details may be highly critical of other individuals who are not.

The INFJ individual is gifted in ways that other types are not. Life is not necessarily easy for the INFJ, but they are capable of great depth of feeling and personal achievement.

474 thoughts on “I think this is hilarious.

  1. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  2. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  3. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  4. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  5. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  6. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  7. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  8. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  9. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  10. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  11. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  12. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  13. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  14. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  15. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  16. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  17. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  18. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  19. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  20. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  21. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  22. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  23. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  24. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  25. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  26. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  27. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  28. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  29. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  30. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  31. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  32. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  33. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  34. voyeurprincess

    per usual

    Your Type
    INTJ
    Introvert(56%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(38%) Judging(22%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (56%)
    You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

    http://typelogic.com/intj.html

    Reply
  35. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
    1. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    2. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    3. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    4. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    5. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    6. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    7. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    8. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    9. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    10. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    11. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    12. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    13. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    14. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    15. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    16. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    17. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    18. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    19. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    20. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    21. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    22. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    23. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    24. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    25. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    26. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    27. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    28. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    29. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    30. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    31. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    32. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    33. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    34. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    35. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    36. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
    37. rbus

      Re: what the fuck?

      It gets better!

      People my type:
      Stephen Hawking – cripple guy in chair
      Andrew Grove – computer geek
      Marie Curie – dead from radiation poisoning
      Guy Kawasaki – greedy bastard
      Igor Sikorsky – just hovered around
      Hillary Clinton – too spineless to leave cheating husband!

      Reply
      1. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      2. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      3. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      4. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      5. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      6. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      7. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      8. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      9. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      10. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      11. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      12. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      13. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      14. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      15. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      16. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      17. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      18. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      19. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      20. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      21. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      22. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      23. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      24. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      25. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      26. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      27. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      28. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      29. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      30. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      31. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      32. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      33. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      34. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      35. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      36. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      37. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      38. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      39. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      40. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      41. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      42. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      43. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
      44. rbus

        Re: what the fuck?

        a self-loathing Judge, in my case.
        i consider the trait one of my greatest weaknesses.

        Reply
  36. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  37. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  38. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  39. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  40. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  41. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  42. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  43. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  44. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  45. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  46. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  47. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  48. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  49. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  50. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  51. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  52. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  53. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  54. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  55. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  56. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  57. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  58. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  59. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  60. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  61. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  62. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  63. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  64. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  65. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  66. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  67. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  68. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  69. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
  70. rbus

    what the fuck?

    INTJ
    Introvert(56%)
    iNtuitive(50%)
    Thinking(1%)
    Judging(78%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion
    (56%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing
    (50%)
    You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling
    (1%)
    You have strong preference of Judging over Perceiving
    (78%)

    I think I see that I judge this as bullshit!

    Reply
    1. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
      1. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
        1. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        2. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        3. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        4. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        5. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        6. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        7. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        8. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        9. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        10. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        11. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        12. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        13. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        14. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        15. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        16. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        17. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        18. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        19. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        20. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        21. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        22. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        23. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        24. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        25. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        26. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        27. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        28. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        29. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        30. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        31. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        32. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        33. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        34. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        35. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        36. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        37. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        38. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        39. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        40. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        41. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        42. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        43. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        44. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
        45. rbus

          hey!!!

          i just did an online i ching thingee on the question:

          “Is the Jung Typology Test accurate?”

          The Answer:
          “There is good fortune, but let him reexamine himself. Let him divine whether his virtue be great, unremitting, and firm. If it be so, there will be no error. Those who have not rested will then come to him. With those who are too late in coming, it will be ill.”

          I Am Enlightened!

          Reply
      2. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      3. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      4. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      5. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      6. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      7. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      8. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      9. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      10. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      11. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      12. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      13. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      14. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      15. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      16. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      17. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      18. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      19. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      20. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      21. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      22. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      23. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      24. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      25. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      26. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      27. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      28. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      29. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      30. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      31. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      32. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      33. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      34. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      35. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      36. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      37. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      38. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      39. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      40. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      41. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      42. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
      43. rbus

        might as well do the I Ching thing…

        whenever i take those tests:

        i answer like they want me to.
        or
        i answer the opposite of the way i really would
        or
        i look for similar questions and answer them in opposite ways.

        i *didn’t* fuck up a 4th grade IQ test.
        i’ve been paying for it ever since.

        buncha bullshit, anyway…

        Reply
    2. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    3. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    4. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    5. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    6. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    7. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    8. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    9. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    10. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    11. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    12. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    13. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    14. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    15. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    16. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    17. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    18. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    19. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    20. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    21. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    22. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    23. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    24. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    25. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    26. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    27. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    28. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    29. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    30. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    31. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    32. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    33. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    34. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    35. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    36. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    37. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    38. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    39. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    40. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    41. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply
    42. anima_fauxsis

      Yeah. I’m kinda personally against most typing types of typcasting thingies since I personally believe in the complicated and ever changing, particularly in relation to context and setting, multi-facited thing that is the human personality.

      Don’t even get me started on the enneagram.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.